Article / IPOS; Singapore; Legal Update

 

  |  

An easy “catwalk” to victory for Vetements Group AG in its application for a declaration of invalidity against the VETEMENTS registered mark that was filed in bad faith in Singapore

Case: Vetements Group AG v Xiamen VETEMENTS Brand Management co, LTD. [2023] SGIPOS 6   Tribunal/Court: Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”)   Type: Trade Mark Invalidation   Applicant: Vetements... Read more
  |  

An easy “catwalk” to victory for Vetements Group AG in its application for a declaration of invalidity against the VETEMENTS registered mark that was filed in bad faith in Singapore

Case: Vetements Group AG v Xiamen VETEMENTS Brand Management co, LTD. [2023] SGIPOS 6   Tribunal/Court: Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”)   Type: Trade Mark Invalidation   Applicant: Vetements... Read more
  |  

NCL Corporation Partially Successful In Opposing Protection of Marks by Norwegian Brand Ltd

Case: NCL Corporation v Norwegian Brand Ltd. [2023] SGIPOS 5   Tribunal/Court: Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”)   Type: Trade Mark Opposition   Applicant: Norwegian Brand Ltd. (“the Applicant”)... Read more
  |  

Aramara successful in invalidating a registered trade mark on grounds of similarity and admission by the other party

Case: Aramara Beauty LLC (dba Glow Recipe) v Sinchen Group Pte. Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 18   Tribunal/Court: Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”)   Type: Opposition   Applicant: Aramara Beauty... Read more
  |  

Daimler unsuccessful in its opposition claim that VIVO is similar to VITO

Daimler unsuccessful in its opposition claim that VIVO is similar to VITO.   Case: Daimler AG v Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. [2022] SGIPOS 1   Tribunal/Court: Intellectual Property Office... Read more